|
Post by vexer on Aug 5, 2009 9:20:16 GMT -6
Yeah same here, I mean I dunno if Wes still has it in him to do 3 more Scream films.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 5, 2009 9:21:36 GMT -6
Look let's play it by year, they may only do 1 more, let's just see what happens, it means another Scream, so I am more then happy.
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Aug 5, 2009 9:22:35 GMT -6
I sure hope it's only one more, cause even that's pushing IMO.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 5, 2009 9:24:21 GMT -6
Why they only did 3 Scream films, they did 6 Saw films so freaking far, why can't they do another with a new Ghostface slashing teens, what is so bad about it?
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Aug 5, 2009 9:27:37 GMT -6
Nothing bad about it, did I even say that? Noooo, i'm just saying that Scream was already feeling tired by part 3(something you yourself said as well BTW), so I dunno if part 4 is gonna be much better.
|
|
|
Post by GL on Aug 5, 2009 9:28:45 GMT -6
Fine, year-by-year on my end.
First one, not looking so good but it's still early and I'll gladly change. It's just not starting off on the right foot.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 5, 2009 9:28:59 GMT -6
Yes part 3 was tired, but not because I was sick of Scream films, just because it was not the best film of the bunch.
It has been 10 years, I want more Screams.
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Aug 5, 2009 9:34:15 GMT -6
Eh, I can think of a dozen more franchises that i'd rather see a new entry in than Scream.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 5, 2009 9:34:58 GMT -6
Then Vexer I have a solution if you don't think you are ready don't see it
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Aug 5, 2009 9:39:21 GMT -6
Oh I probably will see it, and who knows it might be good, but I was just saying that another Scream movie isn't exactly high on my list of upcoming slashers.
|
|
|
Post by GL on Aug 11, 2009 9:04:14 GMT -6
More info on the film avaliable HERE.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 11, 2009 9:45:58 GMT -6
I agree with Dreadcentral that Courtney Cox was the best part of the films, and if she said the idea for Scream 4 is fantastic it must be good!
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Aug 11, 2009 10:23:12 GMT -6
I don't think she was the best part, I always found Sydney the best part, and without her the 4th film will definitely feel inferior to the other films.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 11, 2009 10:27:10 GMT -6
Sydney is overrated.
I thought Gail was terrific.
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Aug 11, 2009 10:34:24 GMT -6
Eh, Gail annoyed me in the first film, though she grew on me in the 3nd, I definitely wouldn't call her terrific though!
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 11, 2009 13:22:28 GMT -6
I would!
Dewey was the annoying one.
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Aug 11, 2009 15:19:34 GMT -6
I was kinda eh about him.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Aug 11, 2009 16:59:49 GMT -6
He sucked.
|
|
chucky
Driller Killer
Posts: 117
|
Post by chucky on Aug 11, 2009 17:20:10 GMT -6
Gail brought the comedy feel to the Scream franchise and that's why i really liked her. I really couldn't care about Sydney she deserves to die.
I'm glad she's not is this to be honest that's why i think this film has hope.
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Oct 23, 2009 19:10:56 GMT -6
Some brief news comes in this evening as we've been tipped off that the Weinstein Company plans to shoot and release Scream IV in 3D. In addition, word on the street is that Wes Craven is closer than ever to returning to the director's chair.
|
|