|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 4, 2009 8:34:11 GMT -6
In the film a sick and twisted burlesque dancer lures a group of fellow female performers to her brother’s home for more then just a party.
What does everyone think of this?
Go find the trailer, it is pretty damn cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jun 4, 2009 9:38:17 GMT -6
Finally, something entertaining sounding this morning.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 4, 2009 9:39:41 GMT -6
What? I have seen loads of fun on this section today lol
This sounds pretty damn good, and should be brainless fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jun 4, 2009 9:45:25 GMT -6
Well, I haven't, as most of what was put up was remakes or Twilight. Not a lot of fun typing "Wait till DVD" on fifty-thousand straight threads.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 4, 2009 9:46:01 GMT -6
I love remakes and Twilight, remakes are better then Twilight, but Twilight is still fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by WahlbergCasket on Jun 4, 2009 15:55:49 GMT -6
I love remakes and Twilight, remakes are better then Twilight, but Twilight is still fun. I actually hate both pretty equally |
|
|
|
Post by suspiria on Jun 4, 2009 16:03:27 GMT -6
I agree with bobby, I love both. But the remakes are starting to get a old.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 4, 2009 18:18:34 GMT -6
I still have no idea why people hate remakes.......
No clue as most are like sequels.......I thought people got over the remake hate ages ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by WahlbergCasket on Jun 4, 2009 18:53:52 GMT -6
I'm not as bad as I used to be about remakes, but I still hate the concept
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 4, 2009 21:37:53 GMT -6
Well there are more like sequels, most are great and they give the old ones new releases.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jun 5, 2009 9:28:46 GMT -6
Ok, but like you said, if they're making them like sequels, just make them straight-up sequels. Like the Friday series. The only thing that's different, structurally, between all of them is the cast and who gets offed in what means. The films are essentially remakes of each other, but no one really cares because they're all so fun and don't call themselves a new version of Friday the 13th every three years. None of them technically follow a franchise rules, as they don't expand on any characters at all (you could make a case for Tommy Jarvis, but that's a topic for a whole other discussion) and except for Tommy and Jason, we don't get to meet anyone in further installements. They're all stand-alone films basically retelling the same story over-and-over, but again, does anyone really complain about that? Why is it such a bad idea to just make installments in a series instead of just remaking a film that doesn't need it to begin with and in most cases, doesn't add anything? When you look at it that way, these are pointless (and is the reason for why I'm not watching these in theaters at all) but on their own, are still fine and I watch them for that reason. But stop remaking everything and just make sequels, I really wouldn't care that it's essentially a remake, I just don't like having ten different films called the same name because they're remaking everything over-and-over again.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 5, 2009 9:31:36 GMT -6
But why? What is a difference between sequels and remakes,
Remakes give them a chance to start fresh, who is gonna see a My Bloody Valentine 2 in theaters, most will go what was the first?
It is a way to give the franchise new life, more pro horror then anything. Like hey this film was so great we wanna respect it with a remake, this argument like wah I don't like them is old.
People just like to bitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Jun 5, 2009 9:32:07 GMT -6
Yeah, it's one thing to remake films from 20 years ago, but when you start remaking films in the 90s, whihc weren't that far back, then that's just getting WAAYYYYY out of hand, and The Crow and Scream are 2 films that DO NOT need to be remade at all, they're just fine the way they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 5, 2009 9:33:19 GMT -6
Scream is no longer a remake and Thee Crow is not horror so don't care.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jun 5, 2009 9:35:52 GMT -6
But why? What is a difference between sequels and remakes, Remakes give them a chance to start fresh, who is gonna see a My Bloody Valentine 2 in theaters, most will go what was the first? It is a way to give the franchise new life, more pro horror then anything. Like hey this film was so great we wanna respect it with a remake, this argument like wah I don't like them is old. People just like to bitch. That's just the way I feel. |
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 5, 2009 9:37:27 GMT -6
Pro remake love!!
|
|
