Happy Birthday To Me 3D

[bobbygory]

Today we learned a little bit more info that might get a few of you excited. After the success of My Bloody Valentine 3D, we're being told Lionsgate has decided to get behind the remake of the classic 80's film and will also produce it in 3-D, instead of moving forward on a MBV:3D sequel (lame). In the original, Virginia is proud that she belongs to a clique. But before her 18th birthday, a grueling set of murders take place and her friends are the ones who are falling prey. Could it be her? She suffers from blackouts due to a freak accident one year earlier. We soon learn the truth behind her accident and what is going on...


Hell yeah!!!


What does everyone think of this?

[vexer]

Cool! I just hope the remake isn't as long as the original, cause 111 minutes is just too long for a slasher.

[suspiria]

It starting to get old, Hollywood needs new writers.

[jc]

Yay! im sure it'll be fun Although I wish it were a Slumber Party Massacre remake they're making instead.

[bobbygory]

I am sure The Slumber Party Massacre will get a remake soon as well,


The original did not feel long though Vexer, and that is what matters.

[vexer]

Well slasher films that ae 100 minutes or longer always feel long to me.

[bobbygory]

Not if I am having fun they don't, running length should never matter. Hell some 80 minute long films can feel long if you are not enjoying them.

[vexer]

yeah I know that, but all the 100 minute plus horror films i've seen deifnitely dragged, acts Of death being one of them, there was at least 10-15 minutes of useless material that could've been cut form that film.

[bobbygory]

Yes I agree, but for me Acts Of Death only dragged at the start, after 30 minutes I was having a blast with it. Anyways I bet this remake will be shorter.

[GL]

God dammit, can't they get rid of this 3D bullshit? This is what's killing the genre right now, not any of that other crap DC is harping about.

[bobbygory]

3D is killing the genre? Sience when? It is a blast!!!!! And 3D is in right and a blast to watch.

[GL]

Can't we just have simple, R-rated, straight 2D films in theaters? This 3D shit is pointless.

[bobbygory]

You don't even see remakes in theaters, should this even matter to you?

The 3D was incredible in My Bloody Valentine, this should be the same, some of those kills in 3D would be insane.

[GL]

3D was simply a gimmick made by filmmakers trying to make their lame films seem more appealing. This new wave of trying to make everything 3D is just as lame.

[bobbygory]

First off most films in 3D are not lame, that is wrong GL. It is added for the audiences, they want you to have the best possible expirience in the theater so they make 3D a option, come on things flying out of the screen. It is amazing.

[vexer]

Yeah, I might not be as enthusiatic about 3-D as Bobby is, but i'm certianly not radically opposed to it either.

[bobbygory]

I think it is a neat little extra, and it is cool to see them in 3D at the theater, ya know get your theater money's worth.

[WahlbergCasket]

Jun 4, 2009 9:46:46 GMT -6 GL said:

3D was simply a gimmick made by filmmakers trying to make their lame films seem more appealing. This new wave of trying to make everything 3D is just as lame.

I agree, it's getting sickening. If a movie has no potential they think making it in 3-D will get people to see it. Although I liked MBV-3D, I hate the new trend it started.

[vexer]

Well the trend probably won't last, especially if Avatar bombs, which I hope it does.

[bobbygory]

Wrong Wahlberg, you could not be more wrong, 3D is not desperate, it is just a gimmick they want to do while making it. They think it would be cool to do, has nothing to do if they think the movie will fail.