|
|
Post by bobbygory on May 28, 2009 9:26:41 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by vexer on May 28, 2009 10:05:43 GMT -6
*Extreme sarcasm* Great! Just what we needed, another pointless goddamn prequel!
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on May 28, 2009 10:09:37 GMT -6
This looks nowhere as good as the first, but it looks pretty good. I like the cover.
|
|
|
|
Post by suspiria on May 28, 2009 13:57:51 GMT -6
I like the artwork, but I probally won't watch this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on May 28, 2009 13:58:22 GMT -6
I know this will be nowhere as good as the first, that worries me sadly.
|
|
|
|
Post by themaskedslasher on May 28, 2009 17:20:01 GMT -6
The cover is great, but I just know the movie will be worthless. What's worse, they waste a perfectly scary scarecrow on a psychological horror film. Bummer.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on May 28, 2009 18:53:08 GMT -6
I know they should have made this into a slasher! I don' see this being psychological however.
|
|
|
|
Post by suspiria on May 28, 2009 19:25:08 GMT -6
Would love to see a good scarecrow slasher.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on May 29, 2009 9:19:43 GMT -6
The original was somewhat decent, nothing memorable, but enough for me to say this one here looks decent enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on May 29, 2009 9:21:33 GMT -6
I saw the trailer for this one again, it looks mild. I am not huge on prequels, and this one does not have the great directors the first had. So I am going in with low expectations.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jun 5, 2009 9:04:59 GMT -6
Better look at the DVD art avaliable HERE. |
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jun 5, 2009 9:07:08 GMT -6
What a way to sell the film, great cover with even a couple good reviews nicely placed, good movie or not one of the best covers of the year.
|
|
