|
|
Post by WahlbergCasket on Jan 21, 2010 17:39:08 GMT -6
The gruesome tapestry of psychological manifestations of a nineteen year old bulimic runaway stripper-turned prostitute as she descends into a hellish pit of satanic nightmares and hallucinations.
The worst movie I have seen this year, and probably last year too! Imagine one hour of zero plot, tampered audio, flashy images, and fucked up editing. Throw in graphic nudity, some decent gore (yes) and CONSTANT vomiting. The movie is the first in the "vomit gore" trilogy which consists of real vomiting (the director has a fetish). There is no real story or acting involved which makes for a boring and extremely slow movie experience. Too fucked up for words, and too shitty/self indulgent for viewing. Directed by "Lucifer Valentine 666"
Any thought?
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 21, 2010 18:31:28 GMT -6
Wow this sounds like shit. They used real puke? Gross. No way would I see this.
|
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Jan 21, 2010 23:44:12 GMT -6
Yeah, I always close my eyes whenever I see somebody vomit, regradless of whether it's real or fake, cause I just REALLY don't like seeing that!
|
|
gg
Driller Killer
Posts: 248 
|
Post by gg on Jan 22, 2010 5:47:58 GMT -6
What I´ve read about this movie - I believe it sucks. No interestin seeing this. To me , it is not gross at all to see someone puking - Unless someone eats it.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jan 22, 2010 10:06:49 GMT -6
Unfortunately, I saw this one, and it's just about as bad as you guys are making it out to be. So low-budget that even without that barrier of actual puke to get through, it's an impossible view since the editing is so crappy a five-year old handles it better, not an attractive-looking woman for miles within, no plot at all to speak of, no scares, no intent to scare, dreary, dull pacing, and frankly, if you're not into that fetish area, you won't be into it.
Take my words, not as a challenge but for the truth:
STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM THIS ONE
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 22, 2010 12:00:48 GMT -6
GG I was eating when I read your post and I got a nasty image in my head. Thanks lol
Trust me GL I am staying far away from this one. Just curious what made you guys wanna see this one?
|
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Jan 22, 2010 14:05:40 GMT -6
Ick! With a title like that you know it's a bad movie! Never gonna see this film, that's for damn sure!
|
|
|
|
Post by WahlbergCasket on Jan 22, 2010 17:43:48 GMT -6
I'm glad GL can back me up. I really like how the back cover describes the plot, but the movie contains no such evidence of that story. ?
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 22, 2010 19:00:25 GMT -6
It amazes me 2 people on this board saw this flick and cared enough to search it out lol
It looks like a utter disgrace.
|
|
|
|
Post by WahlbergCasket on Jan 23, 2010 22:46:24 GMT -6
the sad news is that it's a trilogy!
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 23, 2010 23:41:24 GMT -6
Ha like anyone would want to see the other two.
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jan 25, 2010 10:11:59 GMT -6
GG I was eating when I read your post and I got a nasty image in my head. Thanks lol Trust me GL I am staying far away from this one. Just curious what made you guys wanna see this one? When the movie first came out, the director came on one of the forums I was on at the time (it's since gone under) and offered anyone a free sneak peak at his upcoming film, as he posted it online for a special time and let anyone watch it. He never put the title up, so that we never knew what to expect, just that it was sick and disgusting, which I took to mean it was going to be a Cannibal Holocaust style film, and after I saw it, I knew what he meant by sick and disgusting: not the good kind like CH, but the crappy kind like this one. |
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 25, 2010 12:15:53 GMT -6
Oh I see GL! Well I would have watched it as well. What did the other members think?
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jan 25, 2010 12:32:58 GMT -6
If I recall right, there wasn't a whole lot that took him up on it then (a couple of us saw it during his preview, which was about two-or-three months before it was released) and a lot more actually saw it when it did get released. The ones who saw it during the sneak preview weren't too fond of it, and most of those who saw it during the intended release felt the same way, although there was a couple who tried defending it with little to no success at getting the members to appreciate it. At that forum, it was pretty reviled all around, with a few who did like it in some aspect.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 25, 2010 18:02:13 GMT -6
They really use real puke? I would almost see it but I hate puke.
|
|
|
|
Post by vexer on Jan 25, 2010 18:25:32 GMT -6
Me too! I don't even like seeing people use fake vomit in films let alone real vomit, gross!
|
|
|
|
Post by GL on Jan 26, 2010 10:06:01 GMT -6
Yep, real puke guys. Finger down the throat and everything.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 26, 2010 12:24:24 GMT -6
But is it fake, you know are they trying to sell it as real to make it seem more disturbing. I can't imagine they made the lead actress hurl every time they needed another shot of the scene...........
|
|
|
|
Post by WahlbergCasket on Jan 26, 2010 17:03:19 GMT -6
example: there's one scene where a guy repeatedly throws up in a cup (he's eating someone elses brains) and drinks the vomit, then throws it up, then drinks it....over and over. Obviously the brains are fake but the vomit is 100% real. There's also scenes of a drunk stripper throwing up and it's all over her legs, etc. Really stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbygory on Jan 26, 2010 18:05:51 GMT -6
They would not have someone keep vomiting over and over. Just does not sound right. They also claimed the Blair Witch was real and that was not. It just makes no sense. You can easily make it seem they are throwing up when they are not.
|
|
